Debt would be less under the coalition

Brendan Nelson's refusal to say how much a coalition government would go into debt for during the global financial crisis is a little hypocritical after the coalition mocking Kevin Rudd for not saying the word "billions".

During ABC's Q&A program, Nelson said:

It should be obviously less than it is at the moment and the quality of the
spend should be quite different from what it is.

Does that mean the coalition would go into $314,999,999,999 of debt?